Hi All,

This message comes out of some discussions I had at the current MAAWG meeting 
in Dublin.

I hope this message finds you well. The intent of this is to propose and 
discuss an evolutionary step in the DMARC protocol, which I believe will result 
in increased efficiency, reduced DNS load, and a more accurate reflection of 
the current email landscape.

My team recently concluded an extensive study on the current use and 
performance of DMARC. We analyzed a staggering 3.2 billion emails, and the 
insights drawn are quite enlightening. Of these, 2.2 billion emails 
(approximately 69%) passed the DMARC check successfully. It's quite an 
achievement, reflective of our collective hard work in fostering a safer, more 
secure email environment.

However, upon further analysis, it's evident that a mere 1.6% (or thirty-six 
million) of these DMARC-passed emails relied exclusively on the Sender Policy 
Framework (SPF) for validation. This is a remarkably low volume compared to the 
overall DMARC-passed traffic, raising questions about SPF's relevancy and the 
load it imposes on the DNS systems.

Given the current use case scenarios and the desire to optimize our resources, 
I propose that we explore the possibility of removing the SPF dependency from 
DMARC. This step could result in a significant reduction in DNS load, increased 
efficiency, and an accurate alignment with our predominant use cases.

However, such a fundamental shift in the protocol's architecture warrants a 
clear signifier. I suggest we upgrade our DMARC version string from the current 
state to 'DMARC2.' This upgrade would not only denote the change of SPF 
removal, but also the switch from the Public Suffix List (PSL) to the Tree-Walk 
algorithm.

By moving towards DMARC2, we not only update our standard to better reflect our 
present requirements, but we also make a clear commitment to the ongoing 
evolution and improvement of the protocol.

Best regards,

Tobias Herkula
Mail Security & Transfer
1&1 (GMX, Web.de, Mail.com, IONOS)
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc

Reply via email to