It's not easy to set a DKIM key, I can agree with that. I do think,
Marty should have tested before sending, though.
None of this, however, solves the issue of SPF weakening the DMARC
standard. The weakness in SPF is not incidental, but systematic. That is
- independent of the numbers - the reason why I vote to have SPF removed
from the DMARC standard.
On 22.06.23 15:31, Todd Herr wrote:
When we look at the numbers others have posted on the topic, and we
see a perhaps higher than expected percentage of DMARC passes that
relied on SPF only (or at least a higher than expected rate of DKIM
failures) I'd posit that many of those DKIM failures are due to the
challenges that Marty and people like them face with getting the key
published.
--
Sebastiaan de Vos
Founder
Tel: +43 680 200 22 95
E-Mail: sebasti...@inboxsys.com
Website: http://inboxsys.com
InboxSys Brochure <https://inboxsys.com/inb_files/2019/04/InboxSys.pdf>
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
dmarc@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
