Not that I’m aware of. But even if we leave it unstructured, including examples about what may be useful could be of assistance.
-- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast From: Murray S. Kucherawy <superu...@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 23, 2023 3:12 PM To: Brotman, Alex <alex_brot...@comcast.com> Cc: Matthäus Wander <mail@wander.science>; dmarc@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC policy discovery and invalid tag exception. On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:04 PM Brotman, Alex <Alex_Brotman=40comcast....@dmarc.ietf.org<mailto:40comcast....@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote: I should note that generally, while there's an "error" field available, there's no guidance about what should go in there. (not in 7489 either that I could find in a brief search) Has there ever been any push for structured content there? I think if there has been, that might be valuable input. If not, then although structured is probably better than unstructured, unstructured is almost certainly better than none. -MSK, participating
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
