On March 18, 2024 6:53:29 PM UTC, John R Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: >On Mon, 18 Mar 2024, Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> The text should be terser and clearer, possibly with an example. > >I would be happy to remove the whole thing, since it's only distantly related >to defining or implementing DMARC. I disagree. I think this is a foreseeable risk, so we need to document it. I think the current text strikes the right balance between being silent and being a how-to. Scott K _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list dmarc@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issu... John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - ... John Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 13... Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issu... Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC -... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC -... Benny Pedersen
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issu... John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC -... Dotzero
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WG... Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WG... John R Levine
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WG... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WG... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WG... Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WG... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WG... Alessandro Vesely
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 13... Scott Kitterman
- Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To S... John R Levine