> On May 8, 2024, at 12:59 PM, John Levine <jo...@taugh.com> wrote: > > According to Mark Alley <mark.al...@tekmarc.com>: >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> p=none is one solution, the other ( interoperable method) is to exempt the >> traffic from whatever process is breaking DKIM (i.e. external subject/body >> warning tags, URL rewriting, etc.). But that's a per-customer fix. > > That would require getting the customer to understand that they're causing the > problem and to spend money fixing it, rather than saying "your mail is > broken." > > Good luck with that. Also remember that until DMARC came along, this > all worked just fine.
That’s the easy part in my experience. A good conversation addressing concerns and getting buy in from previously skeptical people is easy in conversation. In my experience the misconceptions are often there yet shallow. They’re easily fixed misconceptions from the whirlwind of information, hype, and I’ve even seen panic. I’m not wise enough to know how to counter that chaotic noise machine at scale. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- dmarc@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to dmarc-le...@ietf.org
