Thanks Andy, adjustments look good. -- Alex Brotman Sr. Engineer, Anti-Abuse & Messaging Policy Comcast
-----Original Message----- From: Andrew (andy) Newton <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2025 2:14 PM To: Brotman, Alex <[email protected]>; IETF DMARC WG <[email protected]> Subject: [dmarc-ietf] Re: DMARC Charter + Aggregate Reporting On 5/16/25 13:40, Brotman, Alex wrote: > FWIW, There are references to the Failure Reporting in the Aggregate > document. It seems like those references need to be adjusted, regardless of > outcome. The charter perhaps may need to reflect that. Apologies on missing > this previously. > Hi Alex, Thanks for pointing this out, while unfortunate this is not a showstopper as the reference is informative. I have modified the charter text to allow the working group to remove the reference from the aggregate reporting doc as an option. I also corrected the other doc ref in the charter by simply removing all refs in the last paragraph as I do not think they are needed. If anybody wants to double check my work, I'd be grateful: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-dmarc/__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!HcZUT5sVvI0FEGiTG5Mirz09LsdmUkkWN9kSdNkY4TtTYoDl1_IEw3B2SckzSfKeRKZhGdJC6Wtca5Ds$ -andy, ART AD _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
