Messages by Date
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Todd Herr
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARC
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Dotzero
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Brotman, Alex
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARC
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Baptiste Carvello
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/04/01
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Tero Kivinen
-
2024/04/01
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Tero Kivinen
-
2024/03/31
[dmarc-ietf] Overall last-call comments on DMARC
Jim Fenton
-
2024/03/31
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC contentious topics (I'm in the rough and I know it) in draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Richard Clayton
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] SPF follies, WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
John Levine
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Mark Alley
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Jim Fenton
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/31
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/31
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Mar 31 06:00:04 2024
John Levine
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Jim Fenton
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
John Levine
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Jim Fenton
-
2024/03/30
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC editorial review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Jim Fenton
-
2024/03/30
Re: [dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/29
[dmarc-ietf] WGLC review of draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Jim Fenton
-
2024/03/28
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Statistics
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/28
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Statistics
Seth Blank
-
2024/03/27
[dmarc-ietf] Aggregate Report Statistics
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/27
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/26
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/26
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/26
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
John R Levine
-
2024/03/26
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/25
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
John R Levine
-
2024/03/25
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Brotman, Alex
-
2024/03/25
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
John R Levine
-
2024/03/25
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/24
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Errata for Aggregate Reporting
John Levine
-
2024/03/24
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Errata for Aggregate Reporting
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/24
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Errata for Aggregate Reporting
John Levine
-
2024/03/24
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/24
Re: [dmarc-ietf] of course no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/24
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Policy Override in aggregate-reporting
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/24
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Mar 24 06:00:04 2024
John Levine
-
2024/03/23
[dmarc-ietf] Errata for Aggregate Reporting
Brotman, Alex
-
2024/03/23
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
John Levine
-
2024/03/23
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/23
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/23
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Brotman, Alex
-
2024/03/23
[dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7489 (7865)
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/23
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Security Considerations in aggregate-reporting
Brotman, Alex
-
2024/03/23
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Inconsistencies in DMARC Aggregate Report XML Schema
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/22
[dmarc-ietf] Security Considerations in aggregate-reporting
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/22
Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Benny Pedersen
-
2024/03/22
[dmarc-ietf] Policy Override in aggregate-reporting
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/22
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/22
Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/22
Re: [dmarc-ietf] of course no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/22
Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Benny Pedersen
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] no DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
John Levine
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Mark Alley
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-14
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
John Levine
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/21
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/20
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Matthäus Wander
-
2024/03/20
[dmarc-ietf] DMARC result for DKIM testing and policy
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/20
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/19
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/19
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
John R Levine
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
John R Levine
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.5
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Dotzero
-
2024/03/18
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Benny Pedersen
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
John R Levine
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Dotzero
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
John Levine
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
John Levine
-
2024/03/17
[dmarc-ietf] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dmarc-failure-reporting-10.txt
internet-drafts
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/17
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/17
[dmarc-ietf] Messages from the dmarc list for the week ending Sun Mar 17 06:00:05 2024
John Levine
-
2024/03/16
[dmarc-ietf] General Purpose Domain
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/16
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Working Group Last Call on draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis-30
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/16
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Section 11.5
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/16
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue - Clarify When Tree Walk Starts?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/16
Re: [dmarc-ietf] The description of psd=n
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/16
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/16
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/16
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/16
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Tero Kivinen
-
2024/03/15
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Neil Anuskiewicz
-
2024/03/15
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/15
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/15
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/15
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/15
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
[dmarc-ietf] DMARC exceptions
Douglas Foster
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
John R. Levine
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
OLIVIER HUREAU
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
OLIVIER HUREAU
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
John Levine
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Murray S. Kucherawy
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Mark Alley
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
John Levine
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
John Levine
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Mark Alley
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Tim Wicinski
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Mark Alley
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Mark Alley
-
2024/03/14
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 136 - DMARC Records Can Be CNAMEs
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
John Levine
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Hector Santos
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Matt V
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
John Levine
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC - Issue 135 - What To Say About Too-Permissive/Third-Party SPF and Where To Say It?
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Alessandro Vesely
-
2024/03/14
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 134 - What To Do With Appendix A.5?
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] A.5 Issues with ADSP in Operation
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] picking nits with the ABNF
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Scott Kitterman
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Fwd: [Errata Held for Document Update] RFC7489 (7835)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Appendix B.2.3. Per-Message Failure Reports Directed to Third Party
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nit: Appendix B.1, examples parallelism and typo
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Section 9.5 DMARC Report Format Registry
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Nit: missing angle brackets
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
[dmarc-ietf] DMARCbis WGLC Issue 132 - 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 SHOULD vs MUST (was Another point for SPF advice)
Todd Herr
-
2024/03/14
Re: [dmarc-ietf] Problem with multiple policies, different alignment
Douglas Foster