Nonetheless, it seems a difficult leap to say that: "Because reports are useless to John, they are useless to everyone."
The implication of this leap is that everyone who accepts failure reports is either conducting inappropriate surveillance or merely dumb. I cannot make that double leap. DF On Sat, Jun 14, 2025, 10:52 AM John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jun 2025, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > >> The reason I know that failure reports are useless is that I have a > >> collection from over a decade and the most interesting thing they've > ever > >> told me is who at LinkedIn subscribes to the same mailing lists I do. > > > > That's the mailing list problem in action. It could be tackled by > asking the > > report generators to omit reporting failures due to mailing lists, e.g. > > through subscriptions tracking. Had we solved this problem, you would > not > > have received any reports, which wouldn't be sufficient to conclude that > they > > are useless. > > I can assure you that I have thousands of failure reports that have > nothing to do with mailing lists, and they're useless too. Please stop > guessing. > > R's, > John > > _______________________________________________ > dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
