Hi Behcet,

I don't know where you could get rev 0.3. Currently in my access, rev 0.2 is 
the latest one.
http://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/23799.htm

And it is saying following

"The types of mobility the system should support, e.g. high mobility, medium 
mobility, low mobility, no mobility and mobility on demand;"

Regards,
Seil Jeon

-----Original Message-----
From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 5:43 PM
To: Seil Jeon <seilj...@gmail.com>
Cc: dmm@ietf.org; Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Seil Jeon <seilj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Behcet,
>
> As I was not there, what discussions was given.
> However, let me speak a few words.
>
> The specs. you referenced seems talking about need of different levels 
> of mobility support, e.g. high/medium/low mobility and so on.


I am looking at Rev 0.3, they no longer have those.
I am hearing that Rev 0.4 is being worked out and maybe posted sometime next 
week.
I hope this clarifies.

Behcet

> Within the frame, I think having a proper level of mobility support 
> based on IP session continuity and IP address reachability for an 
> application, with the defined source IP address type request will make 
> sense in the scope of mobility support in the specs.
>
> Besides, as you know, the spec. currently remains at 0.2 version, 
> describing work items briefly and concisely. It doesn't constraint 
> potentials for on-demand mobility. And we don't know how/where the direction 
> will be going.
>
> Regards,
> Seil Jeon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya
> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 4:52 PM
> To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com>
> Cc: dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> At IETF 95 session, there was some discussion on the mention of on 
> demand mobility in 3GPP 5G documents, e.g. 23.799.
>
> It seems like 3GPP meaning of on demand mobility is that the UE asks 
> or demands mobility support or not.
>
> So that has nothing to do with the sustained IP addresses.
>
> Regards,
>
> Behcet
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jouni Korhonen 
> <jouni.nos...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Folks,
>>
>> This mail starts two week WGLC for the I-D:
>>
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01
>>
>> The WGLC ends 12/15/2015.
>>
>> Provide your reviews and comments to the mailing list. For the better 
>> tracking of issues and proposed changed use the Issue Tracker to 
>> submit your issues/proposals.
>>
>> - Jouni & Dapeng
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dmm mailing list
>> dmm@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>
> _______________________________________________
> dmm mailing list
> dmm@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
>

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to