Hi Behcet, I don't know where you could get rev 0.3. Currently in my access, rev 0.2 is the latest one. http://www.3gpp.org/DynaReport/23799.htm
And it is saying following "The types of mobility the system should support, e.g. high mobility, medium mobility, low mobility, no mobility and mobility on demand;" Regards, Seil Jeon -----Original Message----- From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 5:43 PM To: Seil Jeon <seilj...@gmail.com> Cc: dmm@ietf.org; Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Seil Jeon <seilj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Behcet, > > As I was not there, what discussions was given. > However, let me speak a few words. > > The specs. you referenced seems talking about need of different levels > of mobility support, e.g. high/medium/low mobility and so on. I am looking at Rev 0.3, they no longer have those. I am hearing that Rev 0.4 is being worked out and maybe posted sometime next week. I hope this clarifies. Behcet > Within the frame, I think having a proper level of mobility support > based on IP session continuity and IP address reachability for an > application, with the defined source IP address type request will make > sense in the scope of mobility support in the specs. > > Besides, as you know, the spec. currently remains at 0.2 version, > describing work items briefly and concisely. It doesn't constraint > potentials for on-demand mobility. And we don't know how/where the direction > will be going. > > Regards, > Seil Jeon > > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 4:52 PM > To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com> > Cc: dmm@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 > > Hello Folks, > > At IETF 95 session, there was some discussion on the mention of on > demand mobility in 3GPP 5G documents, e.g. 23.799. > > It seems like 3GPP meaning of on demand mobility is that the UE asks > or demands mobility support or not. > > So that has nothing to do with the sustained IP addresses. > > Regards, > > Behcet > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jouni Korhonen > <jouni.nos...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Folks, >> >> This mail starts two week WGLC for the I-D: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 >> >> The WGLC ends 12/15/2015. >> >> Provide your reviews and comments to the mailing list. For the better >> tracking of issues and proposed changed use the Issue Tracker to >> submit your issues/proposals. >> >> - Jouni & Dapeng >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> dmm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
