Hi guys, Alper and I are in the process of compiling all the new comments we received in the last DMM face to face. We plan to issue a new version of the draft that, hopefully, clarifies the definitions and will provide a written response on the mailing list with further explanation and responses to all the comments.
Please be patient for a couple of days. Thanks, Alper and Danny -----Original Message----- From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 11:43 To: Seil Jeon Cc: dmm@ietf.org Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 5:35 AM, Seil Jeon <seilj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Behcet, > > As I was not there, what discussions was given. > However, let me speak a few words. > > The specs. you referenced seems talking about need of different levels > of mobility support, e.g. high/medium/low mobility and so on. I am looking at Rev 0.3, they no longer have those. I am hearing that Rev 0.4 is being worked out and maybe posted sometime next week. I hope this clarifies. Behcet > Within the frame, I think having a proper level of mobility support > based on IP session continuity and IP address reachability for an > application, with the defined source IP address type request will make > sense in the scope of mobility support in the specs. > > Besides, as you know, the spec. currently remains at 0.2 version, > describing work items briefly and concisely. It doesn't constraint > potentials for on-demand mobility. And we don't know how/where the direction > will be going. > > Regards, > Seil Jeon > > -----Original Message----- > From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Behcet Sarikaya > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 4:52 PM > To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nos...@gmail.com> > Cc: dmm@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DMM] WGLC #1 for draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 > > Hello Folks, > > At IETF 95 session, there was some discussion on the mention of on > demand mobility in 3GPP 5G documents, e.g. 23.799. > > It seems like 3GPP meaning of on demand mobility is that the UE asks > or demands mobility support or not. > > So that has nothing to do with the sustained IP addresses. > > Regards, > > Behcet > > On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Jouni Korhonen > <jouni.nos...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Folks, >> >> This mail starts two week WGLC for the I-D: >> >> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dmm-ondemand-mobility-01 >> >> The WGLC ends 12/15/2015. >> >> Provide your reviews and comments to the mailing list. For the better >> tracking of issues and proposed changed use the Issue Tracker to >> submit your issues/proposals. >> >> - Jouni & Dapeng >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dmm mailing list >> dmm@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > > _______________________________________________ > dmm mailing list > dmm@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm > _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm --------------------------------------------------------------------- A member of the Intel Corporation group of companies This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies. _______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm
