Hello, 

 

I support the WG adoption of the draft (as a co-author and also from a tier-1 
MNO).

BR,

 

-Tianji

 

====

FYI: Here I want to share one more case from 3GPP that would potentially 
benefit from the ANUP-like work in the future.  

 

The FS_5GSAT_Ph3 is a Phase-3 Satellite SID (i.e. project) of the 3GPP SA2 
Release 19. Thanks to the flexible yet complicated 5GC, the SID has one 
architectural assumption to limit the working scope of the transport links 
(i.e., so-called inter-satellite link or ISL) in order to handle the challenges 
with both gNB and 5GC on-board satellite. 

 

When both gNB and 5GC are onboard satellite(s), it implies the criticalness of 
the effective communication between them. The connectivity between both could 
take place on either a satellite or multi-satellites with ISL in between. While 
this is a very challenging issue, the FS_5GSAT_Ph3 has put the assumption in 
that the connectivity as provided by ISL (and Feeder link) is a transport-layer 
problem and 3GPP will not touch it. Further, this SID/project also studies the 
UE-Satellite-UE communication between 2 or more UEs under the coverage of the 
same or different satellites. Evidently, the current gNB+5GC architecture does 
face challenges given the ever-dynamic changing of the underlay 
(satellite-based) constellation network. Fortunately, ANUP-like work could 
better serve the purpose (from both the control-plane and the user-plane 
perspectives).

 

In summary, 
3GPP does have projects that face challenges and might be ultimately & 
optimally addressed by IETF; 
3GPP puts off addressing the issue thanks to the lack of (IETF) tools;
Later (e.g., the 3GPP Rel-20 for 6G in about 12 months), 3GPP will for sure 
revisit the problem. By that moment, if the ANUP-like work has matured 
sufficiently, then it would be a potentially promising option for 3GPP’s 
consideration.
 

Thus, the ANUP-like work is indeed a viable architecture for some hot demands 
right now and for the future.

 

 

 

From: dmm <dmm-boun...@ietf.org> on behalf of Satoru Matsushima 
<satoru.matsush...@gmail.com>
Date: Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 2:41 AM
To: dmm <dmm@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolut...@ietf.org>
Subject: [DMM] DMM WG Adoption Poll (2) for "Mobile User Plane Evolution" - 
draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolution-06

 

Dear DMMers,

 

This email starts a two-weeks DMM WG adoption poll (2) for ""Mobile User Plane 
Evolution" - draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolution-06.

 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zzhang-dmm-mup-evolution/

 

Please review the draft and post any comments on this mail thread prior to 
Friday, November 3rd, 2023.

 

Regards,

Sri, Satoru

 

_______________________________________________ dmm mailing list dmm@ietf.org 
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm 

_______________________________________________
dmm mailing list
dmm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmm

Reply via email to