>I think it is not so much a problem of the kernel, which as you > point out
>can be compiled to suit and by its nature is >backwards compatible in most
>things other than size, but rather >other pieces, a cascade of "what next?"
>dependencies and the >horror of horrors proprietary binary pieces that may be
>>mindlessly craving systemd.
I know how you feel, and with respect to everyone else who are comfortable with
apt - that is why I have developed a distaste for a lot of the Debian package
system. I don’t think that Apt is bad, but its design makes it a target for
extremely poor packaging decisions, which we can certainly commiserate today._______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
