Le 30/04/2015 13:21, Joerg Reisenweber a écrit :
and here is more (sorry to link to the obvious):
http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html (possibly outdated, I didn't
check for a long time)
Thanks Joerg, for recalling the link.
This FHS is nothing more than a summary of current practice; it
does not contain any sound rationale. Adhering to this standard just
means freezing forever an unsatisfactory file hierarchy which is like it
is for historical reasons.
I don't want to make war against the FHS. I'm just considering that
the FHS has little value and I don't care if Debian violates it and
Devuan follows. They will do it in a way which is compatible with the
expectation of applications.
Didier
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
