On Thu 30 April 2015 15:30:06 Didier Kryn wrote: > This FHS is nothing more than a summary of current practice; it > does not contain any sound rationale I beg to differ on that, to me it seems it has all the sound rationale it needs, to for example understand why /bin should have commands that are needed during early boot, before /usr gets mounted.
Thus FHS is not only a summary of current practice but also a guide to understand why that practice got adopted, what been the rationale, and what are the impacts when you deliberately ignore and deviate from such practice, by for example symlinking /s?bin/ to /usr/s?bin or not keeping commands needed during early boot in /s?bin Poettering clearly understood the implications and outright rejected the rationale, by claiming nowadays it wasn't modern anymore to have a small root- fs and a separate partition for /usr /j
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
