On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 08:37:22PM +1200, Daniel Reurich wrote: > > Hi, > > I'd like a straw poll on whether we should include non-free firmware in our > installers by default. > > It's a deviation from Debians traditional position, but a pragmatic one that > shows we care about the end users. > > Keen for feedback.
Maybe we can think about having 2 images for every iso/installer, the default onw as usual without any non-free package, and another one, under a non-free directory structure with some large readme, with non-free drivers bundled. This should not be a so huge additional effort, and will give even more freedom of choice. -- Franco (nextime) Lanza Lonate Pozzolo (VA) - Italy SIP://c...@casa.nexlab.it web: http://www.nexlab.net NO TCPA: http://www.no1984.org you can download my public key at: http://danex.nexlab.it/nextime.asc || Key Servers Key ID = D6132D50 Key fingerprint = 66ED 5211 9D59 DA53 1DF7 4189 DFED F580 D613 2D50 ----------------------------------- echo 16i[q]sa[ln0=aln100%Pln100/snlbx]sbA0D212153574F444E49572045535520454D20454B414D204F54204847554F4E452059415020544F4E4E4143205345544147204C4C4942snlbxq | dc -----------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
