> On July 17, 2015 at 12:57 AM James Powell <james4...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > An LTS branch isn't needed if you do version controlled releases and sponsor > support for versioned releases for at least 3-4 versions back. > > To be fair, I've used Slackware long enough to see how maintaining a versioned > release can go right, and seen enough of Ubuntu to see how it can go horribly > wrong. > > Devuan should have at least 3 branches.
This is not for Devuan 1.0 but I wonder if there is a clever way to use Linux containers to allow a mix of versioned/unstable/experimental for individual packages and their dependencies? I am speaking as one who is about to jump into LXC but has no expertise about it yet. Peter Olson _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
