On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 02:02:22PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote: > Seems to me there's something weird, both, in libreoffice depending on > just one single version of libstdc++, and in libklabxml being broken by this > version of libstdc++, be it the fault of kde or libstdc++ developpers.
That's the GCC-5 transition, unstable is broken as it's supposed to. You can use testing if you're bothered by uninstallable packages (or any other form of the sky falling). > The dependency chains might be shortened by linking at least part of the > libraries statically. All this dependency buysiness mostly comes from the > abuse of dynamic linking. The only real advantage of dynamic linking is > faster upgrade in a distribution, but it often turns out to make it just > impossible. Static linking has no place in a distribution. Among numerous other downsides, any update of a dependency requires a "rebuild world". There's no way to make a security or bugfix update without such a mass recompile. -- ⢎⣉⠂⠠⠤⡀⣄⠤⡀⠠⡅⠀⠤⡧⠄⡄⠀⡄⠀⠀⠀⠠⡅⠀⡠⠤⠄⠀⠀⠀⢴⠍⠀⡠⠤⡀⣄⠤⡀⠀⠀⠀⠤⡧⠄⣇⠤⡀⡠⠤⡀⠀⠀⠀⡄⠀⡄⡠⠤⡀⠠⠤⡀⡇⡠⠄⠀⠀⠀ ⠢⠤⠃⠪⠭⠇⠇⠀⠇⠀⠣⠀⠀⠣⠄⠨⠭⠃⠀⠀⠀⠀⠣⠀⠬⠭⠂⠀⠀⠀⠸⠀⠀⠣⠤⠃⠇⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠣⠄⠇⠀⠇⠫⠭⠁⠀⠀⠀⠣⠣⠃⠫⠭⠁⠪⠭⠇⠏⠢⠄⠀⠄⠀ (https://github.com/kilobyte/braillefont for this hack) _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng