On Sat, 22 Aug 2015 21:46:05 +0200 "tilt!" <t...@linuxfoo.de> wrote:
> I agree with Laurent, the RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK rule weight should > be lowered below treshhold, because > > 1. it's incorrect to mark a mail as spam solely based on this > criterion, because a significant portion of internet users are > in dynablocks, and not all of them are spammers; > > 2. the list already has moderation in place for off-list mails, > so why be so rigid. 3. Because if we start blowing off people with confirmed records of writing code, such as Laurent has done with s6, then what would distinquish our list from Debian-User? SteveT Steve Litt August 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting: Just the Facts http://www.troubleshooters.com/tjust _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
