* On 2015 29 Aug 16:14 -0500, Steve Litt wrote: > Yeah, that isn't a problem, and shouldn't be a problem. Interestingly, > in my LUG, the most pro-systemd guys are the mega-metal admins > administering hundreds of boxes with hundreds of Docker containers. > These guys are telling me systemd is necessary to efficiently manage > the Dockers.
Okay, then the big official unanswered question is why don't RH, et. al. just target that use case and leave the rest of us alone? Why does the rest of the ecosystem need this big sucking sound? It's one thing to develop a tool that makes life easier in some case and quite another to preach that it's needed *everywhere* and pull in the gullible with influence that then dictate this shiny thing is to be valued above all else. - Nate -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
