Steve Litt <sl...@troubleshooters.com> writes: > On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 14:31:40 +0100 > Rainer Weikusat <rainerweiku...@virginmedia.com> wrote: > >> Laurent Bercot <ska-de...@skarnet.org> writes: >> >> [...] >> >> > It manages dependencies between services, no matter whether they are >> > oneshots or longruns; it can intertwine oneshot starts and longrun >> > starts, or oneshot stops and longrun stops. When changing the >> > machine state, it always ensures the consistency of the dependency >> > graph. >> >> I'd still very much like to see an actual example which really needs >> these depenencies which isn't either bogus or a workaround for a bug >> in the software being managed. > > I can't see why any init/processmanager would *not* allow intermixing.
I was asking about (complex) service dependencies because I haven't really encountered something like this so far, only declared dependencies because "we could declare them", eg, the LDAP/sendmail case on Solaris I mentioned or the fact that apache on the box I'm presently using 'depends' on bind and syslog. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
