On 08/03/16 04:41, Simon Hobson wrote:
VNC is lousy over anything but a very fast link, it's just a remote framebuffer - anything painted to the screen is bit copied to the client which is bandwidth intensive.
Whereas tightvnc works quite well over almost anything, and if you are willing to drop to a small colour pallete (with the -bgr233 option) it'll almost work on RS485 over wet string.
My personal experience over the last <cough> years is TightVNC > RDP > VNC, but YMMV.
Brad. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
