On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:39:13 +0000, KatolaZ wrote in message <20160307073913.gn13...@katolaz.homeunix.net>:
> On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 10:53:51AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > * On 2016 06 Mar 02:51 -0600, aitor_czr wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I just uploaded an image of Devuan for Raspberry Pi 2 with LXDE. > > > > My guess is this will not run on the original Pi model B? > > > > - Nate > > > > It probably won't, since rpi2 is armhf, while rpi1 and rpi0 are midway > between armel and armhf. I have been running a few test with a custom > toolchain to make a bootable image for rpi0/1. The base system works > (single-user with bash and busybox, now I might play a bit around to > have coreutils instead), even if there are a few tweaks to > implement. > > The problem is that this would be an almost completely independent > port, for which we might not have enough energy though. It would be > good to have a pivuan for armv6 + FP2 for rpi0, but it is true that > with the new rpi3 it would be far better and easier to invest time in > a pivuan for armhf, which is what aitor is rightfully doing. The > packages are already there, and there is no need to support another > port... ..this means Devuan is _not_ the answer for the millions of armv6+FP2/rpi0/1 users out there. Pity, we could have used them here. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
