Am Samstag, 12. März 2016 schrieb KatolaZ: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 09:19:14AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > [cut] > > > > good to have a pivuan for armv6 + FP2 for rpi0, but it is true that > > > with the new rpi3 it would be far better and easier to invest time in > > > a pivuan for armhf, which is what aitor is rightfully doing. The > > > packages are already there, and there is no need to support another > > > port... > > > > ..this means Devuan is _not_ the answer for the millions of > > armv6+FP2/rpi0/1 users out there. > > Pity, we could have used them here. > > > > > I haven't said I gave up on the rpi0/1 port of Devuan. I have said > that it would be difficult to maintain it, if we ever get to put it in > place.
I might miss the whole point of this discussion, but I have a RPi 1 A + fvwm + devuan running without any problem. But it started with the "official" wheezy raspbian image ... Nik -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng