I guess gnome is there default. However, they have instructions to allow the user to build a custom kali for themselves using live-build. http://docs.kali.org/development/live-build-a-custom-kali-iso
Since Kali 2.0, we now support built in configurations for various desktop environments, including KDE, Gnome, E17, I3WM, LXDE, MATE and XFCE. http://git.kali.org/gitweb/?p=live-build-config.git;a=tree On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 1:26 PM, fsmithred <fsmith...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 07/12/2016 07:07 PM, Simon Walter wrote: > > > > Though I agree that the point and "grunt" style is a bit useless. Which > is > > why I wondered why Kali had a full blown GNOME. What about XFCE or > > openbox? Something minimal please. > > _______________________________________________ > > I took a look at it, too, and I was surprised it was such a resource hog. > I couldn't even stand to use it, running the iso in virtualbox, so I > installed it, booted to single-user mode, changed sources to devuan ascii, > installed sysvinit-core, removed gdm3, rebooted, apt-get update and > apt-get upgrade, apt-get dist-upgrade, removed systemd and as much gnome > stuff as I could, and then added xfce4. > > It works. I have no idea what's broken, but the basic process works. > Kaliascii. > > -fsr > > > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng >
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
