Hendrik Boom <hend...@topoi.pooq.com> writes: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:01:04AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote: >> Quoting Rainer Weikusat (rweiku...@talktalk.net): >> > Rick Moen <r...@linuxmafia.com> writes: >> > > Quoting Rainer Weikusat (rweiku...@talktalk.net): >> > > >> > >> To re-iterate this: >> > > >> > > [more very strangely worded, difficult-to-parse prose, seemingly alleging >> > > that library libsystemd0 can be used to insert 'calls' into unrelated >> > > applications -- which assertion in my view does not seem correct, if I >> > > am parsing this odd claim correctly] >> > > >> > >> I honestly understand why stating this as it is causes hostile >> > >> reactions. >> > > >> > > I cannot recall having said anything hostile to you, >> > >> > Replacing >> > >> > Because of libsystemd, a systemd sub-project, technically >> > gratuitious calls to systemd-specific functions >> > can be inserted into unrelated applications. [as it provides the >> > required symbols] >> > >> > with >> > >> > libsystemd can be used to insert 'calls' into unrelated >> > applications >> > >> > won't win you any prices for objectivity. >> > >> > But this kind of 'discussion' is as tiresome as it is useless. >> >> Rainer, I did not, and do not, understand how the mere presence of >> libsystemd0 can insert 'calls to systemd-specific functions' >> into related applications. > > Once again, it is a matter of trust, not technical content. Do you > trust the maintainers of libsystemd0 not to entangle it with unwanted > systemd-isms? You evidently do. Rainer does not.
If you look at simplified, abstracted version of my sentence, you'll note that it basically says X enables Y to do Z while Moen's sentence is X does Z these are obviously not identical: The subjects differ. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
