Quoting Adam Borowski (kilob...@angband.pl): > On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 09:09:04AM -0700, Rick Moen wrote: > > Quite so. Reading netlink for kernel uevents seems like a solution for > > a problem I happily don't have. > > I'm afraid that with this mindset you're acting like Lennart, who ignores > valid and widespread use cases that just happen to not affect his laptop. > Static devices is a setup that works on only straightforward systems.
Unlike Lennart, I'm not purporting to solve everyone's problems, nor shoving my preferences onto anyone by any means whatsoever. (Was that actually difficult?) I happen to _use_ straightforward systems, hence I find (what I consider) straightforward software solutions to my personal liking and am willing to do a modest amount of extra local work to use them. You seem to have decided that this is A Bad Thing and wish me to feel regret via an extremely contrived poetteringisation analogy. I'l decline the opportunity to feel regret, at this dramatic juncture in our narrative, but I do appreciate the offer. Some other time, perhaps. > Thus, while it is worth supporting that on minimal containers, those are not > systems that boot on their own. Sucks to be them. ;-> > Thus, it's better to simplify things and standardize on.... Oh, you wish to launch a _new_ discussion about what to 'standardize on'? By all means, please feel free. I don't have any special interest in that at this time, but go right ahead. I'll merely note, before you do, that I was extremely clear that I was _not_ talking about that. (Was that actually difficult?) _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng