On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 at 23:05:08 +0000 Bruce Perens <br...@perens.com> wrote:
> It is the fact that the two actions are connected that makes it a breach. > There are very many actions that are legal in isolation, but not when one > is carried out as a consequence of another. The most common instances are > of course in anti-discrimination law. I think you mean such an act goes against national (USA) business law, but this does not mean that it goes against the GPL licence. You might be right that GRSecurity's actions violate some state or national statute, but not that they violate the GPL licence. > As an expert witness, I would have no trouble connecting them for a judge > and showing how they were tantamount to an added term under section 6. Do you mean GPL sec. 6, "Conveying Non-Source Forms"? Alessandro _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
