On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 23:23:59 +0200 Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 05:28:39PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT > consult wrote: > > To be more practical: I'd suggest spinning off a (distro agnostic) > > non-systemd maintenance project. We'll collect repos w/ > > depotterization patches for all packages (and upstream releases) > > we're interested in. And any distro can easily join in. > > > > Just created a github org for that: > > https://github.com/depotter > > > > Started w/ a pretty trivial case: samba > > https://github.com/depotter/samba > > Uhm, but what's the point in _this_? Samba does the right thing: > builds systemdD support if and only if its configure script detected > the headers (which can usually also be forced by --enable-foo or > --disable-foo). Yes, there is 'with-systemd' and 'without-systemd', not that either are really needed, the systemd parts will only be built if the systemd development libs are installed. I cannot see anybody trying to make it mandatory to build Samba with systemd, but if anybody tries, I will just 'NACK' the patches ;-) Rowland _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
