On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 05:50:20AM -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2017 10 Nov 02:40 -0600, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > > Nate Bargmann writes: > > >I've also used Procmail for an > > >equal length of time and it is now claimed to be "unmaintained". > > > > Who claims that? > > Some months back I was looking for some tips on a recipe and seem to > recall comments to that effect. > > A quick check shows Wikipedia asserting the same: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procmail
I've just edited that article to be less biased. Please check if the new tone sounds neutral, and improve it if not. Note: there indeed was one security vulnerability, but it was discovered in 2014, while all the "it's dead" brouchacha happened years before. Meow! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
