On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 03:54:41PM +1100, Erik Christiansen wrote: > On 10.11.17 05:50, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > A quick check shows Wikipedia asserting the same: > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Procmail > > Hmmm ... curiously confused wording puts it in the past tense, but in > the next sentence admits "remains in wide use as its capabilities are > better than its alternatives."
Uhm, check file's history. It'd be nice if someone reworded this into a more homogenous prose. Remember, everyone can edit: MikeeUSA, Lennart, The Donald, even you. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Laws we want back: Poland, Dz.U. 1921 nr.30 poz.177 (also Dz.U. ⣾⠁⢰⠒⠀⣿⡁ 1920 nr.11 poz.61): Art.2: An official, guilty of accepting a gift ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ or another material benefit, or a promise thereof, [in matters ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ relevant to duties], shall be punished by death by shooting. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
