[Redirecting back onto the mailing list for a moment, from Adrian's sudden digression into private mail.]
Quoting Adrian Zaugg (a...@ente.limmat.ch): > I think this DKIM issue or non-issue is just noise for others. Concur. But: I participate on public mailing lists in order to have a public discussion for public benefit.[1] There's nothing wrong with someone inviting another public-discussion participant into private e-mail side-discussion (as you just did, except without explanation), but I would suggest accounting for the reason for private-mail diversion (when you do that), and asking rather than just implicitly expecting participation, in what is a fundamentally different thing, one for private rather than public benefit. As to your private-mail inquiry: I think my meaning in saying 'Nope' on the public thread will be obvious, if you think about the larger discussion context. Hint: Whether or not vm6.ganeti.dyne.org is able to check DKIM signatures is actually irrelevant to the matter that was being discussed (i.e., what is 'wrong'). I didn't think that point justified any comment longer than 'Nope'. [1] And there's a word for wanting answers in private: consulting. ;-> _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng