On Tue, 19 May 2020 12:03:20 -0700 Rick Moen via Dng <dng@lists.dyne.org> wrote:
> > Presumably Steve Litt's point is that Red Hat has to make the > > internals complex so that there's complexity to shield the costomer > > from. > > Steve's is a classic non-testable paranoid It would be testable if we could put on the witness stand under oath somebody who attended the meetings that decided to push systemd. > conspiracy hypothesis. Conspiracies happen. Not every event is brought forth by a single person. I remember a time when scads of us Linux enthusiasts conspired to depose Microsoft. "Conspiracy theory" is not an insult, regardless of how people use the phrase. > These have had fans on a recurring basis in (among other places) > Steve's native USA. Let's not confuse a theory that something is caused by several people, acting together, with people spouting fact-averse, science-hostile, logically incorrect kiddiebabble. Now here's a fact. If Redhat were on trial for foisting systemd upon the world, you'd better believe the prosecutor would bring up the link I proffered earlier in this thread as evidence of motive. SteveT _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng