Paul, do you actually believe that shouting the same thing over and over will achieve anything?
We’ve heard you before, we’ve listened to you, we’ve considered your arguments, and you haven’t convinced us and there’s a consensus between the vendors to go ahead with the change because it’s beneficial for the DNS ecosystem. Sending multiple shouts to mailing lists, issue tracker, etc... because you have different opinion is not helpful to the DNS community nor to the cause. We are as much DNS experts as you are. Ondřej -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> (He/Him) > On 11. 9. 2020, at 4:42, Paul Vixie <p...@redbarn.org> wrote: > > > > > Petr Špaček wrote on 2020-09-08 03:04: >> Dear DNS people. >> >> We are happy to announce next step for DNS Flag Day 2020. >> >> Latest measurements indicate that practical breakage caused by the proposed >> change is tiny [1]. In other words we can conclude that the Internet is >> ready for the change. > > from that study i conclude that the breakage caused by a larger default > bufsize than this so-called "flag day" proposes would be equally tiny. > >> The long delayed DNS Flag Day will become effective on 2020-10-01 (October >> 1st 2020)! > > i strongly recommend that this not be done. > >> Detailed information including test tools and technical description of the >> change can be found at https://dnsflagday.net/2020/ . >> >> For questions please use dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net mailing list. > > here i am. > >> [1] >> https://github.com/dns-violations/dnsflagday/issues/139#issuecomment-673489183 >> > > -- > Sent from Postbox > _______________________________________________ > dns-operations mailing list > dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net > https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
