Thanks guys. That gives me some good things to think about and prepare for. On Jul 31, 2014 12:33 PM, "Brian Rak" <b...@gameservers.com> wrote:
> One option here is to use iPXE ( http://www.ipxe.org/ ) to grab the > netboot files via HTTP (or some other protocol) instead of relying on > TFTP. There's some extra configuration work here, but serving up the 365KB > iPXE image to clients via TFTP is a lot less work then serving up the > entire kernel/initrd package. > > On 7/23/2014 11:13 PM, Linux Luser wrote: > > I have a project where I use dnsmasq for netboot installs. Currently, > there can be an unlimited number of installs happened at once. At what > point (number of TFTP transfers happening in parallel) should I be > concerned that I'm overtaxing dnsmasq's TFTP capabilities? Does dnsmasq use > threads or multiprocessing for TFTP transfers? > > Thanks. > > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing > listdnsmasq-disc...@lists.thekelleys.org.ukhttp://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > > >
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
