On Friday 01 January 2016 20:54:53 Simon Kelley wrote: > On 23/12/15 21:10, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Do not call add_do_bit which is only for dnssec code. > > --- > > > > src/forward.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/src/forward.c b/src/forward.c > > index 041353c..bffea78 100644 > > --- a/src/forward.c > > +++ b/src/forward.c > > @@ -793,8 +793,10 @@ void reply_query(int fd, int family, time_t > > now) > > > > header->hb4 |= HB4_CD; > > > > if (forward->flags |= FREC_AD_QUESTION) > > > > header->hb4 |= HB4_AD; > > > > +#ifdef HAVE_DNSSEC > > > > if (forward->flags & FREC_DO_QUESTION) > > > > add_do_bit(header, nn, (char *)pheader + plen); > > > > +#endif > > > > forward_query(-1, NULL, NULL, 0, header, nn, now, forward, > > forward->flags & FREC_AD_QUESTION, forward->flags & > > FREC_DO_QUESTION); return; > > > > } > > Is this against 2.75? All the EDNS0 header code has had a major > overhaul in the development code, and I think that this is probably > no longer relevant. If not please shout and I'll look again.
Current code in git: ce5732e84fc46d7f99c152f736cfb4ef5ec98a01 -- Pali Rohár pali.ro...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
