Hello
Any chance to review this patch ? ...
Thanks
Jarek
On 03/10/2016 01:26 PM, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hello
On 03/04/2016 10:41 PM, Simon Kelley wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Didn't want to ignore this, so this is just to acknowledge your patch.
I need some more time to work back into PXE internals and undertsnad
exactly what's going on. Will return soon with questions.
Sure, it would be nice to have this proxy DHCP problem solved
in dnsmasq since now it cannot be used for PXE booting (only in
proxy DHCP mode of course) of UEFI platforms.
In mean time I've been able to test the patch on ~ 30 more hardware
models: BIOS/UEFI (including UEFI on arm64) and it seems to
work as expected.
Best Regards
Jarek
Cheers,
Simon.
On 02/03/16 09:17, Jarek Polok wrote:
Hello
I've seen in list mail archives that the problem of UEFI systems
not booting while using PXE boot menu has been discussed in the
past already:
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2015q4/010007
.html
and a patch was proposed.
I tried that patch but for some UEFI firmwares it did not work for
me.
Tracing reply proxyDHCP packet from a Microsoft WDS server I was
able to change the patch a little and it seems to make proxyDHCP
work for all clients I've been able to test with (4 different
hardware models and qemu-kvm with OVMF (Tianocore) firmware).
In addition to filling in siaddr and bootfile in the reply header
my version fills also sname then avoids adding option 43 (some
clients did not boot without sname set..)
This is how WDS replies on 4011 for PXE requests for all BIOS/EFI
clients ..
(WDS also adds option 252, filled with text representation of data
possibly needed by WDS bootloader , seems to contain architecture
path, some (G)UUID and BCD location ?)
In the attachment you will find my version of the patch, adding
'pxe-menu-skip=<CSA>' option which makes dnsmasq to 'shortcut' boot
process sending back to pxe client first matching (by tag and CSA)
pxe-service when acting in proxy-DHCP mode.
Dear maintainer: would you please consider adding this patch to
dnsmasq ?
Best Regards
Jarek
__ ------------------------------------------------------- _
Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/CM/LCS _ _
http://cern.ch/~jpolok ________ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
______________________________________+41_75_411_9487 _
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss
mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=V7wV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
--
__
-------------------------------------------------------
_ Jaroslaw_Polok ___________________ CERN - IT/CM/LCS _
_ http://cern.ch/~jpolok ________ tel_+41_22_767_1834 _
______________________________________+41_75_411_9487 _
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
