Hi, In article <11034711-6140-1e7c-5eeb-ad951fee2...@thekelleys.org.uk>, Simon Kelley<si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > My second example gives exactly that. To clarify, the serial numbers in > the names correspond to the addresses in the range supplied. If you use > a subnet to specify the range, for instance 192.168.202.0/24, then yes > dyn-1 will be 192.168.202.0, but if you use start,end to specify the > range, then the start address becomes dyn-1, so for > > --synth-domain=gently.org.uk,192.168.202.50,192.168.202.70,dyn-* > > 192.168.202.50 is dyn-1
Ah, apologies, I hadn't realised that. In that case then, this sounds perfect to meet my needs. > (or maybe dyn-0. Do we want this one-based or zero-based? Having a > choice is NOT an option) I think I'd want dyn-1 personally, but don't feel particularly strongly about it either way to be honest. Thanks. Andy _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss