On 24/10/2018 16:25, Petr Mensik wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I have not managed it until dnsmasq 2.80 were out, but anyway. I have
> some proposal to simplify handling of options bits. Static analysis
> complains on compiler dead-code optimization. I propose having array
> instead. It adds few defines. But it allows adding any bits to defines
> and moving OPT_LAST. It will resize itself as required.
> 
> It might be possible to change unsigned int to unsigned long. It would
> use 64 bit numbers on x86_64 machines. But I guess it might not be worth
> that optimization.
> 
> Chances to get it merged?
> 
> 

Merged as is. a definite improvement.


Cheers,

Simon.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to