On 18.02.21, 22:10, "Dnsmasq-discuss on behalf of Geert Stappers"
<dnsmasq-discuss-boun...@lists.thekelleys.org.uk on behalf of
stapp...@stappers.nl> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 12:11:55AM +0100, Etan Kissling wrote:
> > On 17.02.21, 23:41, Geert Stappers" wrote:
> > > > +#if defined(HAVE_CONNTRACK) && defined(HAVE_UBUS)
> > >
> > > One of many
> >
> > Sorry, I don't understand the comment for these.
>
> The sorry should come from me. I was way too short with text.
> Thing I trying to tell is that the wish is to avoid #if
> conditionals. Reason I remember is reducing the amount
> of different binaries. But HAVE_CONNTRACK is already
> present in current source.
No new binaries are created with this patch. The existing HAVE_CONNTRACK
symbol is used to guard accessing Netfilter connection track marks.
The existing HAVE_UBUS symbol is used to guard OpenWrt specific code.
Furthermore, even when those symbols are defined, all new code only
activates when the configuration option to enable the feature is set:
if (option_bool(OPT_CMARK_ALST_EN))
Thanks
Etan
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
