On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 10:44:48AM -0700, Michael wrote: > > However, if you are running DHCP and dnsmasq is updating/maintaining a list > of host names of your local clients in the leases file, then only one of the > dnsmasq instances is going to know about those. In this instance, I think > makes more sense to ensure you have one really robust dnsmasq system than > having two that don't respond the same. > This is exactly my situation, the main reason for running dnsmasq is that I want names for devices on my LAN. If I didn't want/need this then I'd be better off letting my router provide DHCP, and DNS forwarding. No need for dnsmasq at all.
-- Chris Green _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
