Hi Simon, thanks for your reply.
The mac address is required by the CAPPORT implementation I would like to use. I will not say that the mac address is always required when using CAPPORT but for the selected implementation (Aruba ClearPass) it is required. Many thanks, Florian On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 6:21 PM Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > What I can't get from a quick reading of the RFCs it how the > captive-portal URI is derived from the client characteristics. The RFCs > imply that the final, encoded part of the URI is an opaque identifier > that's returned by the DHCP part of the captive portal and then accepted > by the http part. It's not even clear to me that it needs to be unique > to a client. Enlightenment on this matter would be appreciated. > > One thing that should be done and it very easy is to add the RA option > in the same way that others are just derived from the corresponding > DHCPv6 option. > > Simon. > > > > On 26/05/2023 13:20, Florian Baaske via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > > Hi Pert, > > > > thanks for the help. Much appreciated. > > > > I found something in regards to ISC as the DHCP server and thought that > > DNSMASQ might have the same feature. > > > > BR > > Florian > > > > On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 12:26 PM Petr Menšík <pemen...@redhat.com > > <mailto:pemen...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Added captive-portal DHCP option to database. > > > > But I am afraid dnsmasq can serve different URLs only for explicitly > > registered clients with separate options. It cannot make the url > > dynamically based on incoming request. There is no script able to > > customize offered options online. > > > > On 5/26/23 09:16, Florian Baaske via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > >> > >> Hi, > >> I would like to setup a Guest network with DNSMASQ. For that Guest > >> network, I would like to use CAPPORT or RFC8908. > >> To make this work, the DHCP server needs to send option 114, which > >> should not be a problem, but option 114 should have the URL to the > >> CAPPORT server including the MAC address of the client. > >> So, my questions would be, is it possible to include the clients > >> MAC address in the DHCP response? > >> I have found a solution for ISC DHCP but was not able to find > >> anything for DNSMASQ. If someone could help, this would be much > >> appreciated. > >> > >> BR > >> Florian > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > >> Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk <mailto: > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > >> > https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > <https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss> > > > > -- > > Petr Menšík > > Software Engineer, RHEL > > Red Hat,https://www.redhat.com/ <https://www.redhat.com/> > > PGP: DFCF908DB7C87E8E529925BC4931CA5B6C9FC5CB > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > > <mailto:Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk> > > > https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss < > https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > > https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss >
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
