These records are not cached, right? In my anecdotal experience, they represent just 2 to 5% of the queries. Though these records are not very common, their TTL is fairly high, so it might make sense to cache them as well, since their replies necessarily gate subsequent queries, which would improve latency of the latter's.
I’d gladly contribute a patch if this is deemed worthwhile. Cheers, -- Evandro Menezes _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
