On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:44:13PM +0200, Erik Karlsson wrote:
> From: Erik Karlsson <erik.karls...@iopsys.eu>
> 
> Not doing so can result in a use after free since the name for DHCP
> derived DNS records is represented as a pointer into the DHCP lease
> table. Update will only happen when necessary since lease_update_dns
> tests internally on dns_dirty and the force argument is zero.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erik Karlsson <erik.karls...@iopsys.eu>
> ---
>  src/dnsmasq.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/src/dnsmasq.c b/src/dnsmasq.c
> index a9f26ae..1be3b82 100644
> --- a/src/dnsmasq.c
> +++ b/src/dnsmasq.c
> @@ -1518,6 +1518,7 @@ static void async_event(int pipe, time_t now)
>         {
>           lease_prune(NULL, now);
>           lease_update_file(now);
> +         lease_update_dns(0);
>         }
>  #ifdef HAVE_DHCP6
>       else if (daemon->doing_ra)
> -- 
> 2.43.2
> 

Looks good to me.

For preventing that the patch falls through the cracks,
send the patch to email address '~stappers/dnsmasqm...@lists.sr.ht'
to get it at https://lists.sr.ht/~stappers/dnsmasqmlpc/patches
(mlpc: mailinglistpatchcollector)


Groeten
Geert Stappers
-- 
Silence is hard to parse

_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss

Reply via email to