At 9:16 AM -0400 4/27/09, Joe Abley wrote:
>On 27-Apr-2009, at 09:05, Edward Lewis wrote:
>
>>Perhaps we should avoid the RFC 5513 "HSM" and just spell it out - a 
>>(cryptographic) hardware support module.
>
>Hardware Security Module is the more usual expanded form, I think?

It is indeed. "hardware support module" sounds like a crypto accelerator chip, 
which has a completely different function, one that doesn't include holding 
private keys.

--Paul Hoffman, Director
--VPN Consortium
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to