No hat. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 04:11:26AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote: > since time is short, i would prefer a server-side change, supported by a > spec change (which means this would head back to namedroppers@) whereby > (bufsize<1220 && DO=1) would be treated as (DO=0).
Of course, some have argued that this isn't a protocol change anyway. That said, > TCP just because they're probing middlebox PMTU and blinding trying 512. perhaps part of the problem involves "blindly trying". Olafur posted a message from the DNSEXT Chairs today that suggests we (the DNS community) need to unpack that assumption, at least. A -- Andrew Sullivan a...@shinkuro.com Shinkuro, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
