a few of us actually did a little work in this area three or four years ago - did working proof of concepts - and were promptly ignored. (the claim was - this work was premature)
--bill On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 01:23:51PM -0400, Edward Lewis wrote: > At 13:13 -0400 9/8/09, Paul Wouters wrote: > > >At least for TLD's, we expect this to be fixed in December with a signed > >root. > > The root may be signed by then. But I have not seen plans for an > interface for the TLDs to use to submit key material. > > >I am not sure what appliance or software setup '.pr' uses, but it should > >have > >never allowed to finish the key rollover with the bad key in the ISC DLV. > > Avoiding addressing just the symptoms, I will say that the most > annoying part in documenting SEP supercession is that we have to > "wave our hands" at that point and say "when we notice that the > $parent has changed the DS record we proceed" to the next step. > Besides this hand waving, it's impossible to script this into a test > plan. > -- > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- > Edward Lewis > NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 > > As with IPv6, the problem with the deployment of frictionless surfaces is > that they're not getting traction. > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
