On Apr 1, 2010, at 12:29 AM, John Jason Brzozowski wrote: > Not necessarily, if a dual stack hosts communicates with a recursive name > server over both IPv4 and IPv6 and other conditions are met then I believe > it would be fine based on what was presented.
What other conditions need to be met? I did not think there was any way for a host to signal a recursive NS to use v6 or v4 transport. -- TTFN, patrick > On 3/31/10 5:12 PM, "John Payne" <j...@sackheads.org> wrote: > >> >> >> On Mar 31, 2010, at 3:19 PM, Dan Wing wrote: >> >>> Any host that sends its AAAA queries over IPv4 would lose >>> IPv6 connectivity. >> >> >> Isn't this a misdirection? >> >> I suspect it's more like: any (address family agnostic) clients of a dual >> stacked nameserver will (non?) deterministically lose IPv6 connectivity to >> DNS-determined destinations. >> >> ie, even if I only send DNS over IPv6 to my recursive nameserver, if it is >> dual stacked (often beyond my control), and for this specific query it >> prefers >> IPv4, then I will not get an answer for my AAAA under this proposal. >> >> > > ========================================= > John Jason Brzozowski > Comcast Cable > e) mailto:john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com > o) 609-377-6594 > m) 484-962-0060 > w) http://www.comcast6.net > ========================================= > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop > _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
