> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 22:52:34 +0000 > From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com > > well, at least two schemas have been proposed and there was > limited uptake either time. perhaps times have changed.
the fact that so few people have spoken up gives me my answer -- there's not enough interest in this to make it worth doing. previous efforts did not become RFC's in any form, and it seems likely that another would also not make it. > well, one thing that kind of makes sense is where to anchor such > records... two choices - a WKA such as in-addr.arpa, ip6.int, > enum.arpa et.al. or place the entries at each delegation point > and sweep the tree periodically to build a stale cache of data... in the basenote of this thread i was only proposing this for registries of names. so, vix._domain._whois._registry.com for vix.com, and similarly pv15._contact._whois._registry.com for the PV15 contact in the COM registry. i'm aware of your prior work to do this for numbers but that wasn't my topic. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
