On 10/25/2011 10:20, Ted Lemon wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 24, 2011, at 5:30 PM, "Doug Barton" <do...@dougbarton.us>
> wrote:
>
>>> I think there's a need for IETF to document why any other value
>>> than 1 is a Bad Idea, and more to the point, why it will break
>>> things. The problem isn't entirely specific to hosts with
>>> multiple interfaces. But given that using multiple interfaces
>>> makes the problem worse, MIF might want to take on some of the
>>> work of documenting why it will break things.
>>
>> That seems to be an opinion of yours that isn't widely shared.
>
> The fact that many of us are tired of this interminable rathole and
> want it to stop is not an indication that we agree with you, Doug.
> Consensus is not, or at least should not be, determined by counting
> the number of email messages for and against.
Thank $DEITY that's true, or Keith would "win" every "vote." :)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
