On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 07:12:56PM +0000, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com <bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com> wrote a message of 49 lines which said:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > > Title : Root Name Server Operational Requirements > Author(s) : Root Server System Advisory Committee > Filename : draft-rssac-dnsop-rfc2870bis-04.txt Section 3.2.1 : I do not understand why you need synced time for DNSSEC. The root name servers do not generate signatures. Section 3.2.1 : Several root name servers, such as B, reply to ICMP echo requests, which I think is a good thing, but it seems disallowed in your document. Section 4.2 : This advice directly contradicts RFC 6382. Do you plan to reclassify it as Historic? Section 5.1 : "Announcement of planned outages also keeps other operators from investigated a scheduled maintenance window." My english parser broke here. Should I upgrade it or should you rewrite the sentence? (For the record, I agree with most of Joe Abley's remarks on high-level issues with this document.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
